![]() ![]() Co-authors communicate and receive voice notifications about the activities along with popups. Our cloud-based collaborative writing platform is designed especially for the visually impaired where they write, manage and share documents. Communication is done through comments which are not helpful for blinds. Google Docs, Microsoft word add-in, and other available tools do not provide voice-based notifications about dynamic actions for the visually impaired in a shared environment. ![]() By use of modern technology, we can easily overcome this issue. The recommendations contribute to improving the accessibility, acceptability, and usability of eHealth interventions by the elderly.ĭue to the lack of confidence and vision capability, it becomes very difficult for blind individuals to perform group activities with sighted persons. ![]() Based on the case study and the systematic review, we developed 24 recommendations on how to deal with challenges during eHealth usability evaluations. ![]() Overall, the results showed that not all established eHealth usability evaluation methods are applicable with elderly users. The results of the systematic review showed that user-based eHealth usability evaluation methods are mostly applied to conduct eHealth usability evaluations with elderly users. However, Cooperative Usability Testing and Co-Discovery Evaluation were not suitable. Our results showed that Remote User Testing combined with Think Aloud could successfully be applied to evaluate the eHealth intervention with elderly users. We supplemented the case study (March, 2021) with a systematic review (March, 2022) to identify (1) applied eHealth usability evaluation methods to elderly and (2) challenges of eHealth usability evaluations with elderly. The case study was conducted with seven Austrian elderly users. We chose three established eHealth usability evaluation methods to evaluate an eHealth intervention: (1) Co-Discovery Evaluation, (2) Cooperative Usability Testing, and (3) Remote User Testing combined with Think Aloud. This study aims to examine the challenges in applying eHealth usability evaluation methods with elderly users and how these challenges can be overcome. However, it is unclear whether such eHealth usability evaluation methods are also applicable with elderly users. Previous research has shown that there are a variety of eHealth usability evaluation methods suitable for agile, easily applicable, and useful eHealth usability evaluations. Some general guidelines are discussed,įor designing user interfaces of collaborative editors that are more usable when interacting via screen reader. In addition, the behavior of the collaborativeįunctions analyzed (as well as the rendering) changes from one web browser to another. Content perception is often incomplete, since many elements or changes occurring in the collaborativeĮnvironment are not intercepted by the screen reader and announced to the user. Results highlight several difficulties encountered when interacting with elements of the In this paper we illustrate and discuss results of an accessibility inspection of the main collaborative functions of Googleĭocs using the JAWS screen reader. That are difficult to use via screen reader, or are sometimes even inaccessible for the blind. Unfortunately collaborative software often relies heavily on visual features and dynamic technologies with user interfaces Collaborative software tools allow people to share documents and knowledge via Internet, in a simple, economic and efficient ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |